Jef Spaleta (jspaleta) wrote,
Jef Spaleta
jspaleta

Patented Oddness...

So looking back over the last few months of all the coverage concerning ooxml and how very bad it is... it seems to me that a lot of people have made it a point to question whether the ooxml specification has patented bits. Even in countries where software patents aren't so very important...yet.. the very issue of patents on bits of the ooxml specification made some sort of press.

Compared to the situation we have for patent encumbered audio/video standards..i find such interest in talking about the ooxml patent issue quite out of proportion. Why does the world, the free world, the world where innovation is yet to be shackled by the constraints of enforced software patents care so very much about the patentability of ooxml, but for audio/video format specifications, its barely on anyone's radar at all as something to be up in arms about?

Why is that? Why does the "wrongness" of patents on bits of ooxml get significantly more global press, but the known "wrongness" of patents on standard audio/video formats get far less scrutiny? Why do people care so much more on a global scale about the openness of their text and presentations, then they do about their audio and video? In the parts of the world where software patents are not the law of the land yet...why do patents in ooxml matter any more than patents in a/v software matter? In those places you are as free to ignore the issue and develop and use ooxml decode/encoding software as you are to develop and use an mp3 codebase. But for some reason the patent issue in ooxml hasn't been completely ignored. So why the uproar over ooxml when there's no wide spread passion to do the right thing when it comes to a/v and replace mp3 and mpeg with something unencumbered by patents?

Does it come down to the bottom line pressure of business to business economic needs instead of the liberty of personal freedoms? Do we need businesses and governments to start doing more audio/video interactions before a compelling reason to drag the industry forward into using an unencumbered a/v encoding standard? Do individual retail users matter at all in these sorts of standard setting conversations? Or are we simply consumers to be placated with shiny gadgets tied to the end of multi-year service and content delivery contracts? Is a/v still so much just a toy that if we lost all our video and audio encodings tomorrow the world wouldn't even skip a beat and we'd just go on buying the next re-mastered version of The Beatles White Album in whatever the next format is the media industry wants to sell us. Why does the world care so very much more about the issue of open accessibility of "documents" over the non-issue of accessibility of "media" ?



-jef
Subscribe

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 2 comments